CakeDC Blog

TIPS, INSIGHTS AND THE LATEST FROM THE EXPERTS BEHIND CAKEPHP

Integrating Users and ACL plugins in CakePHP

In previous posts, we saw how CakeDC Users plugin can help you to build an application that manages everything related to users: registration, social login, permissions, etc. Recently it has been noted by the team that there are some use cases where a deeper control of permissions is needed - more than is offered in RBAC. Today we’ll go into this using the ACL approach.

ACL or Access Control List, refers to the application using a detailed list of objects to decide who can access what. It can be as detailed as particular users and rows through to specifying which action can be performed (i.e user XX has permissions to edit articles but does not have permissions to delete articles).

One of the big features of ACL is that both the accessed objects; and objects who ask for access, can be organized in trees.

There’s a good explanation of how ACL works in the CakePHP 2.x version of the Book.

ACL does not form part of CakePHP core V 3.0 and can be accessed through the use of the cakephp/acl plugin.

Let’s just refresh the key concepts of ACL:

  • ACL: Access Control List (the whole paradigm)

  • ACO: Access Control Object (a thing that is wanted), e.g. an action in a controller: creating an article

  • ARO: Access Request Object (a thing that wants to use stuff), e.g. a user or a group of users

  • Permission: relation between an ACO and an ARO

For the purpose of this article - we shall use this use case: You are using CakeDC/users plugin and now want to implement ACL in your application.

Installation

Starting with a brand new CakePHP app:

composer selfupdate && composer create-project --prefer-dist cakephp/app acl_app_demo && cd acl_app_demo

We are going to use CakeDC/users and cakephp/acl plugins. In a single step we can install them with composer:

composer require cakedc/users cakephp/acl

Create a DB and set its name and credentials in the config/app.php file of the just created app (in the Datasources/default section). This command can help you out if you are using MySQL:

mysql -u root -p -e "create user acl_demo; create database acl_demo; grant all privileges on acl_demo.* to acl_demo;"

Plugins will be loaded always with the app. Let’s set them on the bootstrap file:

bin/cake plugin load -br CakeDC/Users
bin/cake plugin load -b Acl

Now let’s insert a line in bootstrap.php before Users plugin loading, so cakedc/users will read the configuration from the config/users.php file of our app.

Configure::write('Users.config', ['users']);

This file does not exist yet. The plugin provides a default file which is very good to start with. Just copy it to your app running:

cp -i vendor/cakedc/users/config/users.php config/

Also, let’s copy the permissions file the same way to avoid warnings in our log files:

cp -i vendor/cakedc/users/config/permissions.php config/

We need to change cakedc/users config: remove RBAC, add ACL. In cakephp/acl there’s ActionsAuthorize & CrudAuthorize. We’ll start just using ActionsAuthorize. We will tell ActionsAuthorize that actions will be under the 'controllers/' node and that the users entity will be MyUsers (an override of the Users entity from the plugin).

Edit the Auth/authorize section of config/users.php so that it sets:

        'authorize' => [
            'CakeDC/Auth.Superuser',
            'Acl.Actions' => [
                'actionPath' => 'controllers/',
                'userModel' => 'MyUsers',
            ],
        ],

Add calls to load components both from Acl & Users plugin in the initialize() method in AppController:

class AppController extends Controller
{
    public function initialize()
    {
        parent::initialize();
        
        // (...)
        $this->loadComponent('Acl', [
            'className' => 'Acl.Acl'
        ]);
        $this->loadComponent('CakeDC/Users.UsersAuth');
        // (...)
    }
    
    // (...)
}

Database tables

Some tables are required in the database to let the plugins work. Those are created automatically just by running their own migrations:

bin/cake migrations migrate -p CakeDC/Users
bin/cake migrations migrate -p Acl

One table from the Acl plugin needs to be fixed because Users migration creates users.id as UUID (CHAR(36)) and Acl migrations creates AROs foreing keys as int(11). Types must match. Let’s fix it adapting the aros table field:

ALTER TABLE aros CHANGE foreign_key foreign_key CHAR(36) NULL DEFAULT NULL;

Now, it’s time to set our own tables as needed for our app. Let’s suppose we are developing a CMS app as specified in the CMS Tutorial from the CakePHP book.

Based on the tutorial, we can create a simplified articles table:

CREATE TABLE articles (
    id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
    user_id CHAR(36) CHARACTER SET latin1 COLLATE latin1_swedish_ci NOT NULL,
    title VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
    body TEXT,
    published BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
    created DATETIME,
    modified DATETIME,
    FOREIGN KEY user_key (user_id) REFERENCES users(id)
);

Note: Specify CHARACTER SET and COLLATE for user_id only if the table CHARACTER SET and COLLATE of the table differ from users.id (than may happen running migrations). They must match.

Roles will be dynamic: admin will be allowed to manage them. That means that they has to be stored in a table.

CREATE TABLE roles (
    id CHAR(36) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
    name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
    created DATETIME,
    modified DATETIME
);

Association between users and roles bill be belongsTo, so we’ll need a foreign key in the users table instead of a role varchar field:

ALTER TABLE users
    ADD role_id CHAR(36) CHARACTER SET latin1 COLLATE latin1_swedish_ci NULL DEFAULT NULL AFTER role,
    ADD INDEX role_id (role_id),
    ADD FOREIGN KEY (role_id) REFERENCES roles(id);

ALTER TABLE users
    DROP role;

Baking

Time to think about what will be ACOs and AROs. In most cases, Users will be the only AROs. To do that, we need to link the Users entity and table to the ACL plugin. In this case that we are using CakeDC/users plugin, we first need to extend the plugin as it is explained in the docs. We will also add the behavior and parentNode() as shown in the cakephp/acl readme file, so at the end we’ll need to create those files:

src/Model/Entity/MyUser.php:

<?php
namespace App\Model\Entity;

use CakeDC\Users\Model\Entity\User;

/**
 * Application specific User Entity with non plugin conform field(s)
 */
class MyUser extends User
{
    public function parentNode() {
        return ['Roles' => ['id' => $this->role_id]];
    }
}

src/Model/Table/MyUsersTable.php:

<?php
namespace App\Model\Table;

use CakeDC\Users\Model\Table\UsersTable;

class MyUsersTable extends UsersTable
{
    public function initialize(array $config)
    {
        parent::initialize($config);

        $this->addBehavior('Acl.Acl', ['requester']);
        
        $this->belongsTo('Roles');
        $this->hasMany('Articles');
    }

}

Run bin/cake bake controller MyUsers (beware of case)

Then, edit the top of src/Controller/MyUsersController.php as:

<?php
namespace App\Controller;

use App\Controller\AppController;
use CakeDC\Users\Controller\Traits\LinkSocialTrait;
use CakeDC\Users\Controller\Traits\LoginTrait;
use CakeDC\Users\Controller\Traits\ProfileTrait;
use CakeDC\Users\Controller\Traits\ReCaptchaTrait;
use CakeDC\Users\Controller\Traits\RegisterTrait;
use CakeDC\Users\Controller\Traits\SimpleCrudTrait;
use CakeDC\Users\Controller\Traits\SocialTrait;

class MyUsersController extends AppController
{
    use LinkSocialTrait;
    use LoginTrait;
    use ProfileTrait;
    use ReCaptchaTrait;
    use RegisterTrait;
    use SimpleCrudTrait;
    use SocialTrait;
    
    // CRUD methods ...

To generate the template files for MyUsers we can run:

bin/cake bake template MyUsers

Next, just let Cake bake all objects for articles and roles:

bin/cake bake all Articles
bin/cake bake all Roles

Add behavior to their tables. ArticlesTable will act as controlled because it will represent ACOs:

class ArticlesTable extends Table
{
    public function initialize(array $config)
    {
        parent::initialize($config);
        
        // (...)
        $this->addBehavior('Acl.Acl', ['controlled']);
        // (...)

The case of RolesTable will be similar but it will act as requester, as it will represent AROs:

class RolesTable extends Table
{
    public function initialize(array $config)
    {
        parent::initialize($config);
        
        // (...)
        $this->addBehavior('Acl.Acl', ['requester']);
        // (...)

Create the parentNode() method in both entities: Article and Role.

    public function parentNode() {
        return null;
    }

Testing

Ok, time to test the whole system! At this point, the app should be ready to use. At least, for an administrator. Let’s quickly create one: it is as easy as running bin/cake users add_superuser. New credentials will appear on screen.

When accessing our app in the URL that we installed it, a login form will appear. Log as the just created admin.

First, let’s create some roles. Go to /roles in your app’s URL. Then, click on "New Role". Create the roles:

  • Author
  • Editor
  • Reader

Then, we can create two users an author and a reader. Head to /my-users and add them. Remember to select the Active checkbox and the proper role in the dropdown menu.

Because MyUsers has the AclBehavior, AROs has been automatically created while creating users, along with the created roles. Check it out with bin/cake acl view aro

Aro tree:
---------------------------------------------------------------
  [1] Roles.24c5646d-133d-496d-846b-af951ddc60f3
    [4] MyUsers.7c1ba036-f04b-4f7b-bc91-b468aa0b7c55
  [2] Roles.5b221256-0ca8-4021-b262-c6d279f192ad
  [3] Roles.25908824-15e7-4693-b340-238973f77b59
    [5] MyUsers.f512fcbe-af31-49ab-a5f6-94d25189dc78
---------------------------------------------------------------

Imagine that we decided that authors will be able to write new articles and readers will be able to view them. First, let’s create the root node for all controllers:

bin/cake acl create aco root controllers

Then, let’s inform ACL that there are such things as articles:

bin/cake acl create aco controllers Articles

Now, we will tell that there are 5 actions related to Articles:

bin/cake acl create aco Articles index

bin/cake acl create aco Articles view

bin/cake acl create aco Articles add

bin/cake acl create aco Articles edit

bin/cake acl create aco Articles delete

We can see the first branch of the ACOs tree here:

bin/cake acl view aco

Aco tree:
---------------------------------------------------------------
  [1] controllers
    [2] Articles
      [3] index
      [4] view
      [5] add
      [6] edit
      [7] delete
---------------------------------------------------------------

ACL knows that articles can be added, so let’s tell who can do that. We can check which aro.id belongs to role Author with:

mysql> select id from roles where name like 'Author';
+--------------------------------------+
| id                                   |
+--------------------------------------+
| 24c5646d-133d-496d-846b-af951ddc60f3 |
+--------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

And the same with the Reader role::

mysql> select id from roles where name like 'Reader';
+--------------------------------------+
| id                                   |
+--------------------------------------+
| 25908824-15e7-4693-b340-238973f77b59 |
+--------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

So, if we look up this id in the bin/cake acl view aro output, it turns out that aro.id 1 is Author and that aro.id 3 is Reader.

If we want to let authors (ARO 1) add articles (ACO 5), we must grant permission to Articles/add to editors by running:

bin/cake acl grant 1 5

And we'll grant readers (ARO 3) view articles (ACO 4) with:

bin/cake acl grant 3 4

Don't forget to grant access to Articles/index for all roles, or nobody would access /articles:

bin/cake acl grant 1 3

bin/cake acl grant 2 3

bin/cake acl grant 3 3

Note: Obviously, it would be easier to set a "super role" which includes the 3 roles and grant access to index to it, but we don't want to add too many steps in this tutorial. You can try it for yourself.

Then, aros_acos table becomes:

mysql> select * from aros_acos;
+----+--------+--------+---------+-------+---------+---------+
| id | aro_id | aco_id | _create | _read | _update | _delete |
+----+--------+--------+---------+-------+---------+---------+
|  1 |      1 |      5 | 1       | 1     | 1       | 1       |
|  2 |      3 |      4 | 1       | 1     | 1       | 1       |
|  3 |      1 |      3 | 1       | 1     | 1       | 1       |
|  4 |      2 |      3 | 1       | 1     | 1       | 1       |
|  5 |      3 |      3 | 1       | 1     | 1       | 1       |
+----+--------+--------+---------+-------+---------+---------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Let’s create a new article as the first user. To do that:

  • Log out (we are still logged in as superadmin) going to /logout
  • Log in as the first created user
  • Go to /articles
  • Create an article

Right now, author can add an article but not view it, since we only set the add permission. Check it out clicking in View next to the article.

Log in as a reader to check how the reader can really view the article.

Obviously, more than a couple of permissions have to be grant in a big app. This tutorial served just as an example to start.

Last words

That's all for now related to the use of ACL in a webapp made with CakePHP. A lot more can be done with ACL. Next step would be to use CrudAuthorize to specify which CRUD permissions are granted for any ARO to any ACO.

Keep visiting the blog for new articles!

This tutorial has been tested with:

  • CakePHP 3.5.10
  • CakeDC/users 6.0.0
  • cakephp/acl 0.2.6

An example app with the steps followed in this tutorial is available in this GitHub repo.

Please let us know if you use it, we are always improving on them - And happy to get issues and pull requests for our open source plugins. As part of our open source work in CakeDC, we maintain many open source plugins as well as contribute to the CakePHP Community.

Reference

Latest articles

PHP 8.5 Pipe Operator: A New Era of Readable Code

This article is part of the CakeDC Technical Blog Series (5th December 2025)

PHP 8.5 Pipe Operator: A New Era of Readable Code

The PHP 8.5 pipe operator brings a powerful new way to write clear, maintainable code. Drawing inspiration from functional programming languages and Unix command-line tools, this feature transforms how we chain operations and handle data flow in our applications.

Background: What is Piping and the Pipe Operator

The concept of piping originates from Unix systems in the 1960s, where Douglas McIlroy introduced the pipe symbol (|) to connect commands together. Each command processes data and passes the result to the next command, creating a smooth flow of information: cat users.txt | grep "active" | sort | uniq This simple pattern revolutionized how programmers think about data transformation. Instead of storing intermediate results in variables or nesting function calls, piping lets us read code from left to right, following the natural flow of data as it transforms step by step. Modern programming languages embraced this concept through the pipe operator. Elixir uses |>, F# has its pipe-forward operator, and R provides the %>% pipe from the magrittr package. Each implementation shares the same core idea: take the result from one expression and feed it as input to the next function.

The Journey to PHP 8.5

PHP developers have long wanted a native pipe operator. Before PHP 8.5, we worked around this limitation using various creative approaches. One common pattern involved custom pipe functions using closures and array reduction: function pipe(...$functions) { return fn($input) => array_reduce( $functions, fn($carry, $fn) => $fn($carry), $input ); } $transform = pipe( fn($text) => trim($text), fn($text) => strtoupper($text), fn($text) => str_replace('HELLO', 'GOODBYE', $text) ); echo $transform(" hello world "); This approach works, but it requires extra boilerplate and doesn't feel as natural as a language-level operator. The PHP 8.5 pipe operator (|>) changes everything by making piping a first-class language feature.

Understanding the Pipe Operator Syntax

The pipe operator in PHP 8.5 uses the |> symbol to pass values through a chain of transformations. Here's the basic pattern: $result = " hello world " |> (fn($text) => trim($text)) |> (fn($text) => strtoupper($text)) |> (fn($text) => str_replace('HELLO', 'GOODBYE', $text)); // Result: "GOODBYE WORLD" Each closure receives the result from the previous step and returns a new value. The pipe operator automatically passes this value to the next closure in the chain. Notice how we wrap each closure in parentheses - this is required by the PHP 8.5 implementation to ensure proper parsing.

The Short Syntax with Spread Operator

When a pipe step simply passes its input directly to a function without transformation, spread operator provides a cleaner syntax: // Verbose: wrapping in a closure $result = " hello " |> (fn($text) => trim($text)) |> (fn($text) => strtoupper($text)); // Clean: using spread operator $result = " hello " |> trim(...) |> strtoupper(...); The ... syntax tells PHP "pass whatever comes from the pipe as arguments to this function." This works beautifully when you're not transforming the data between steps, making your pipelines even more readable. The real power emerges when we combine pipes with pattern matching and result types, creating clear, maintainable code that handles both success and failure cases elegantly.

Adopting Elixir Phoenix Style in CakePHP Controllers

This article demonstrates a particular approach: bringing the elegant functional patterns from Elixir's Phoenix framework to CakePHP's controller layer. Phoenix developers are familiar with piping data through transformations, using pattern matching for control flow, and explicitly handling success and error cases through result types. These patterns have proven themselves in production applications, making code more maintainable and easier to reason about. By combining PHP 8.5's pipe operator with custom result types, we can write CakePHP controllers that feel similar to Phoenix controllers while staying true to PHP's object-oriented nature. Instead of nested conditionals and scattered error checks, we create clear pipelines where data flows from one transformation to the next. The Result and FormResult classes mirror Elixir's tagged tuples ({:ok, data} and {:error, reason}), giving us the same expressiveness for handling outcomes. This isn't about replacing CakePHP's conventions - it's about enhancing them. We still use CakePHP's ORM, validation, and view rendering, but we organize the control flow in a more functional style. The result is controller code that reads like a story: fetch the data, validate it, save it, send notifications, redirect the user. Each step is explicit, each error case is handled, and the overall flow is immediately clear to anyone reading the code.

Building Blocks: Result Types for Functional Flow

Before diving into practical examples, we need to establish our foundation: result types that represent success and failure outcomes. These classes work hand-in-hand with the pipe operator to create robust, type-safe data flows.

The Result Class: Success or Error

The Result class represents any operation that can succeed or fail. It's a simple but powerful abstraction that eliminates messy error handling and null checks: <?php declare(strict_types=1); namespace App\Result; use Exception; /** * Result type for functional programming pattern * * @template T */ class Result { public function __construct( public readonly string $status, public readonly mixed $data = null ) { } public static function ok(mixed $data): self { return new self('ok', $data); } public static function error(mixed $data): self { return new self('error', $data); } public function match(callable $ok, callable $error): mixed { return match ($this->status) { 'ok' => $ok($this->data), 'error' => $error($this->data), default => throw new Exception('Unknown result status') }; } public function isOk(): bool { return $this->status === 'ok'; } public function isError(): bool { return $this->status === 'error'; } } The Result class uses PHP 8.0's constructor property promotion and readonly properties to create an immutable container. We can create results using static factory methods: Result::ok($data) for success cases and Result::error($data) for failures. The match() method provides pattern matching - we give it two functions (one for success, one for error) and it automatically calls the right one based on the result's status. This eliminates conditional logic and makes our code more declarative.

The FormResult Class: Rendering Responses

While Result handles business logic outcomes, FormResult specializes in web application responses. It represents the two main actions a controller can take: redirect to another page or render a template: <?php declare(strict_types=1); namespace App\Result; use Exception; /** * Form result type for controller actions */ class FormResult { private ?string $flashMessage = null; private string $flashType = 'success'; public function __construct( public readonly string $type, public readonly mixed $data = null ) { } public static function redirect(string $url): self { return new self('redirect', $url); } public static function render(string $template, array $vars): self { return new self('render', ['template' => $template, 'vars' => $vars]); } public function withFlash(string $message, string $type = 'success'): self { $this->flashMessage = $message; $this->flashType = $type; return $this; } public function getFlashMessage(): ?string { return $this->flashMessage; } public function getFlashType(): string { return $this->flashType; } public function match(callable $onRedirect, callable $onRender): mixed { return match ($this->type) { 'redirect' => $onRedirect($this->data), 'render' => $onRender($this->data['template'], $this->data['vars']), default => throw new Exception('Unknown result type') }; } } FormResult includes a fluent interface for adding flash messages through withFlash(). This method returns $this, allowing us to chain the flash message directly onto the result creation: FormResult::redirect('/posts') ->withFlash('Post created successfully!', 'success') Both result types use the same pattern matching approach, creating a consistent programming model throughout our application.

Viewing a Post: Simple Pipe Flow

Let's start with a straightforward example: viewing a single post. This action demonstrates the basic pipe operator pattern and how FormResult handles different outcomes.

The View Action

public function view($id = null) { return $id |> $this->findPost(...) |> (fn($post) => $post ? FormResult::render('view', ['post' => $post]) : FormResult::redirect('/posts') ->withFlash('Post not found', 'error')) |> $this->handleFormResult(...); } This compact method demonstrates the elegance of pipe-based programming. Let's trace how data flows through each step.

Step 1: Starting with the ID

return $id |> $this->findPost(...) We begin with the post ID parameter. The pipe operator passes this ID directly to findPost() using the spread operator syntax. This clean notation means "take the piped value and pass it as the argument to findPost()". The method attempts to retrieve the post from the database.

The findPost Helper

private function findPost(string|int $id): mixed { try { return $this->Posts->get($id); } catch (\Exception $e) { return null; } } This helper method wraps the database query in a try-catch block. If the post exists, we return the entity. If it doesn't exist or any error occurs, we return null. This simple pattern converts exceptions into nullable returns, making them easier to handle in our pipe flow.

Step 2: Making a Decision

|> (fn($post) => $post ? FormResult::render('view', ['post' => $post]) : FormResult::redirect('/posts') ->withFlash('Post not found', 'error')) The second step receives either a Post entity or null. Using a ternary operator, we create different FormResult objects based on what we received. When the post exists, we create a render result containing the post data. When the post is null, we create a redirect result with an error message. Notice how the flash message chains directly onto the redirect using withFlash() - this fluent interface keeps the code clean and expressive.

Step 3: Converting to HTTP Response

|> $this->handleFormResult(...); The final step takes our FormResult and converts it into a CakePHP HTTP response. Let's look at this helper method: private function handleFormResult(FormResult $result): Response|null { if ($result->getFlashMessage()) { $this->Flash->{$result->getFlashType()}(__($result->getFlashMessage())); } return $result->match( onRedirect: fn($url) => $this->redirect($url), onRender: fn($template, $vars) => $this->renderResponse($template, $vars) ); } First, we check if the result contains a flash message. If it does, we set it using CakePHP's Flash component. The dynamic method call $this->Flash->{$result->getFlashType()} allows us to call success(), error(), or warning() based on the flash type. Then we use pattern matching to handle the two possible result types. For redirects, we call CakePHP's redirect() method. For renders, we delegate to another helper: private function renderResponse(string $template, array $vars): Response|null { foreach ($vars as $key => $value) { $this->set($key, $value); } return $this->render($template); } This helper extracts all variables from the FormResult and sets them as view variables, then renders the specified template.

The Complete Data Flow

Let's visualize how data flows through the view action: Input: $id (e.g., "123") ↓ findPost($id) ↓ Post entity or null ↓ Ternary decision: - If Post: FormResult::render('view', ['post' => $post]) - If null: FormResult::redirect('/posts')->withFlash('...') ↓ handleFormResult($result) ↓ - Set flash message (if present) - Pattern match on result type: * redirect: return $this->redirect($url) * render: return $this->renderResponse($template, $vars) ↓ HTTP Response to browser Each step in this flow has a single responsibility, making the code easy to understand and test. The pipe operator connects these steps without requiring intermediate variables or nested function calls.

Editing a Post: Complex Pipeline with Validation

Editing a post involves more complexity: we need to find the post, validate the submitted data, save changes, and provide appropriate feedback. This scenario showcases the real power of combining pipes with result types.

The Edit Action

public function edit($id = null) { if ($this->request->is(['patch', 'post', 'put'])) { return [$id, $this->request->getData()] |> (fn($context) => $this->findAndValidate(...$context)) |> (fn($result) => $result->match( ok: fn($data) => $this->savePost($data), error: fn($error) => Result::error($error))) |> (fn($result) => $result->match( ok: fn($post) => FormResult::redirect('/posts') ->withFlash('The post has been updated!', 'success'), error: fn($error) => FormResult::render('edit', $error) ->withFlash('The post could not be saved. Please, try again.', 'error'))) |> $this->handleFormResult(...); } return $id |> $this->findPost(...) |> (fn($post) => $post ? FormResult::render('edit', ['post' => $post]) : FormResult::redirect('/posts') ->withFlash('Post not found', 'error')) |> $this->handleFormResult(...); } This method handles two scenarios: GET requests to display the edit form, and POST/PUT requests to save changes. Let's explore the POST request flow in detail.

Step 1: Creating the Context

return [$id, $this->request->getData()] |> (fn($context) => $this->findAndValidate(...$context)) We start by creating an array containing both the post ID and the form data. The pipe operator passes this array to the next step, where we use the spread operator (...$ctx) to unpack it into individual arguments for findAndValidate(). This makes it clear that we're passing the ID and data as separate parameters rather than working with array indexes like $context[0] and $context[1].

Finding and Validating Together

private function findAndValidate(string|int $id, array $data): Result { $post = $this->findPost($id); if (!$post) { return Result::error([ 'post' => null, 'errors' => ['Post not found'], ]); } $validation = $this->validatePost($data); if ($validation->isError()) { return Result::error([ 'post' => $post, 'errors' => $validation->data, ]); } return Result::ok([ 'post' => $post, 'data' => $validation->data, ]); } This method performs two checks in sequence. First, we verify the post exists. If it doesn't, we return an error Result immediately. If the post exists, we validate the submitted data: private function validatePost(array $data): Result { $post = $this->Posts->newEmptyEntity(); $post = $this->Posts->patchEntity($post, $data); if ($post->hasErrors()) { return Result::error($post->getErrors()); } return Result::ok($data); } The validation creates a new entity and patches it with the submitted data. If CakePHP's validation rules find any problems, we return a Result::error() with the validation errors. Otherwise, we return Result::ok() with the validated data. This two-step validation ensures we have both a valid post ID and valid form data before proceeding. The Result type makes it easy to handle errors at each step without nested if-else blocks.

Step 2: Saving the Post

|> (fn($result) => $result->match( ok: fn($data) => $this->savePost($data), error: fn($error) => Result::error($error))) Now we have a Result that either contains our post and validated data, or an error. Pattern matching handles both cases elegantly. On the success path, we call savePost() with the validated data. On the error path, we simply pass the error through unchanged. This is a key pattern in pipe-based programming: errors propagate automatically through the pipeline without special handling. The match() call ensures type consistency since both branches return a Result object.

The savePost Helper

private function savePost(array $context): Result { $post = $this->Posts->patchEntity($context['post'], $context['data']); if ($this->Posts->save($post)) { return Result::ok($post); } return Result::error([ 'post' => $post, 'errors' => $post->getErrors() ?: ['Save failed'], ]); } This method patches the existing post entity with the validated data and attempts to save it. If saving succeeds, we return Result::ok() with the updated post. If saving fails, we return Result::error() with any validation errors from the database.

Step 3: Creating the Response

|> (fn($result) => $result->match( ok: fn($post) => FormResult::redirect('/posts') ->withFlash('The post has been updated!', 'success'), error: fn($error) => FormResult::render('edit', $error) ->withFlash('The post could not be saved. Please, try again.', 'error'))) The third step transforms our Result into a FormResult. Again, pattern matching handles both cases. On success, we create a redirect with a success message. On error, we re-render the edit form with the error data and an error message. Notice how errors from any previous step automatically flow to this error handler. Whether validation failed in step 1 or saving failed in step 2, we end up here with the appropriate error information to show the user.

Step 4: Converting to HTTP Response

|> $this->handleFormResult(...); The final step uses the same handleFormResult() method we saw in the view action, converting our FormResult into an HTTP response. The spread operator syntax keeps this final step clean and readable.

Visualizing the Edit Flow

The complexity of the edit action becomes clearer with a sequence diagram showing how data flows through each transformation: sequenceDiagram participant User participant Controller participant Pipeline participant Helpers participant Database User->>Controller: POST /posts/edit/123 Controller->>Pipeline: [$id, $data] Note over Pipeline: Step 1: Find & Validate Pipeline->>Helpers: findAndValidate(123, $data) Helpers->>Database: Get post by ID alt Post not found Database-->>Helpers: null Helpers-->>Pipeline: Result::error(['Post not found']) Pipeline->>Pipeline: Skip to Step 3 (error path) else Post found Database-->>Helpers: Post entity Helpers->>Helpers: Validate form data alt Validation failed Helpers-->>Pipeline: Result::error(['errors' => [...]]) Pipeline->>Pipeline: Skip to Step 3 (error path) else Validation passed Helpers-->>Pipeline: Result::ok(['post' => $post, 'data' => $validData]) Note over Pipeline: Step 2: Save Post Pipeline->>Helpers: savePost(['post' => $post, 'data' => $validData]) Helpers->>Database: Save updated post alt Save failed Database-->>Helpers: false Helpers-->>Pipeline: Result::error(['errors' => [...]]) Pipeline->>Pipeline: Continue to Step 3 (error path) else Save successful Database-->>Helpers: true Helpers-->>Pipeline: Result::ok($updatedPost) Note over Pipeline: Step 3: Create Response Pipeline->>Pipeline: FormResult::redirect('/posts') Pipeline->>Pipeline: ->withFlash('Success!', 'success') end end end Note over Pipeline: Step 4: Handle Result Pipeline->>Helpers: handleFormResult($formResult) Helpers->>Controller: HTTP Response Controller->>User: Redirect or render edit form This diagram illustrates several important aspects of our pipeline: Error Propagation: When an error occurs at any step, it flows through the remaining steps until reaching the error handler in Step 3. We don't need explicit error checking at each level. Type Transformations: Notice how data types evolve through the pipeline:
  • Start: [int, array] (ID and form data)
  • After Step 1: Result<array> (post and validated data, or errors)
  • After Step 2: Result<Post> (saved post, or errors)
  • After Step 3: FormResult (redirect or render decision)
  • After Step 4: Response (HTTP response)
Decision Points: Each match() call represents a decision point where the pipeline branches based on success or failure. These branches merge back into a common FormResult type, ensuring consistent handling at the end.

The GET Request Flow

The GET request handling in the edit action is simpler, following the same pattern we saw in the view action: return $id |> $this->findPost(...) |> (fn($post) => $post ? FormResult::render('edit', ['post' => $post]) : FormResult::redirect('/posts') ->withFlash('Post not found', 'error')) |> $this->handleFormResult(...); We find the post, create a FormResult based on whether it exists, and convert it to an HTTP response. The pipe operator makes this three-step process read naturally from top to bottom.

Benefits and Patterns

Working with the pipe operator reveals several powerful patterns that improve our code quality.

Linear Reading Flow

Traditional nested function calls or method chains force us to read code inside-out or bottom-up: // Without pipes: read from inside to outside return $this->handleFormResult( $this->findPost($id) ? FormResult::render('view', ['post' => $this->findPost($id)]) : FormResult::redirect('/posts')->withFlash('Not found', 'error') ); The pipe operator lets us read top-to-bottom, following the natural flow of data: // With pipes: read from top to bottom return $id |> $this->findPost(...) |> (fn($post) => $post ? FormResult::render(...) : FormResult::redirect(...)) |> $this->handleFormResult(...);

Debugging Made Easy

When debugging a pipeline, we can easily insert a tap() function to inspect values at any point without disrupting the flow: private function tap(mixed $value, string $label = 'Debug'): mixed { debug("{$label}: " . json_encode($value, JSON_PRETTY_PRINT)); return $value; } Then add it anywhere in the pipeline: return [$id, $this->request->getData()] |> (fn($context) => $this->tap($context, 'Context')) |> (fn($context) => $this->findAndValidate(...$context)) |> (fn($result) => $this->tap($result, 'After validation')) |> (fn($result) => $result->match(...)) The tap() function logs the value and returns it unchanged, letting us peek into the pipeline without modifying its behavior.

Type Safety Through the Pipeline

Each step in our pipeline has clear input and output types. The Result and FormResult classes enforce type consistency, making it impossible to accidentally pass the wrong data type to the next step. PHP's type system, combined with these result types, catches errors at development time rather than runtime.

Separation of Concerns

Each helper method has a single, clear purpose. The findPost() method handles database retrieval, while validatePost() focuses on data validation. The savePost() method takes care of database persistence, and handleFormResult() manages HTTP response generation. The pipe operator connects these focused functions into a complete workflow. This separation makes each function easy to test in isolation while maintaining a clear picture of the overall process.

Error Handling Without Try-Catch

The Result type eliminates the need for try-catch blocks throughout our code. Instead of throwing and catching exceptions, we return Result::error() and use pattern matching to handle failures. This approach makes error handling explicit and forces us to consider both success and failure paths.

Practical Considerations

Performance

You might wonder if all these function calls and object creations impact performance. In practice, the overhead is negligible. Modern PHP's opcache optimizes these patterns effectively, and the benefits in code maintainability far outweigh any microscopic performance difference.

Learning Curve

Developers new to functional programming patterns might initially find pipes and result types unfamiliar. However, once the concepts click, most developers find this style more intuitive than traditional imperative code. The linear flow and explicit error handling reduce cognitive load compared to nested conditionals and scattered error checks.

When to Use Pipes

The pipe operator shines in scenarios with multiple sequential transformations. Form processing workflows benefit greatly from pipes as they typically involve validating data, saving it to the database, sending notifications, and finally redirecting the user. Data transformation pipelines that fetch, filter, transform, and format information also work beautifully with pipes. Multi-step business processes like checking inventory, calculating prices, creating orders, and sending confirmations become more readable when expressed as pipe chains. For simple operations with just one or two steps, traditional code often reads better. Consider a basic calculation that needs no error handling: // Overkill with pipes - harder to read $total = $items |> (fn($items) => array_sum(array_column($items, 'price'))) |> (fn($sum) => $sum * 1.2); // Clearer without pipes $subtotal = array_sum(array_column($items, 'price')); $total = $subtotal * 1.2; Similarly, simple database queries don't benefit from piping: // Unnecessary complexity with pipes $posts = [] |> (fn() => $this->Posts->find()) |> (fn($query) => $query->where(['status' => 'published'])) |> (fn($query) => $query->all()); // Much clearer as method chain $posts = $this->Posts->find() ->where(['status' => 'published']) ->all(); Use pipes when they genuinely improve readability and maintainability, particularly when handling multiple transformations with different return types or error handling needs.

Conclusion

The PHP 8.5 pipe operator brings functional programming elegance to PHP without sacrificing the language's pragmatic, object-oriented roots. By combining pipes with result types and pattern matching, we can write code that clearly expresses intent, handles errors gracefully, and remains easy to test and maintain. The examples in this article demonstrate how pipes transform complex controller actions into readable, step-by-step transformations. Each step has a clear purpose, errors flow naturally through the pipeline, and the final code reads like a description of what happens rather than a series of imperative commands. As PHP continues to evolve, features like the pipe operator show the language's commitment to adopting the best ideas from functional programming while staying true to its accessible, practical nature. Whether you're building simple CRUD applications or complex business workflows, the pipe operator gives you a powerful new tool for writing better code. This article is part of the CakeDC Technical Blog Series (5th December 2025)

CakePHP and the Power of Artificial Intelligence

This article is part of the CakeDC Advent Calendar 2025 (December 2th 2025)

Bringing smart automation to modern web development

When we talk about Artificial Intelligence today, we are not talking about the future, we are talking about tools we already use every day, such as our phones, code editors, browsers and productivity apps. For developers, AI represents a new wave of innovation that allows us to embed intelligence directly into our projects to build smarter, more adaptive, and more valuable digital products. At CakeDC, we’ve been exploring how CakePHP 5 can be seamlessly integrated with AI to deliver powerful, automated, and intelligent solutions.

Why combine CakePHP and AI?

Both technologies share a core philosophy: efficiency and structure. CakePHP offers a clean MVC framework, robust validation, and an ORM that keeps your data organized and secure. On the other hand, AI brings reasoning, summarization, and contextual understanding to your application. By combining them, we can:
  • Automate repetitive processes.
  • Enhance user experience.
  • Add value to existing products.
  • Unlock new opportunities for digital innovation.
The result? Smarter apps with a strong core.

What AI means today

AI enhances productivity not by replacing people, but by amplifying human capabilities. It helps analyze data, generate content, automate workflows, and make better decisions faster. And thanks to APIs like OpenAI’s, this power is now accessible to every PHP developer. Imagine a world where your CakePHP app can:
  • Understand natural language input.
  • Summarize uploaded reports.
  • Classify customer feedback.
  • Generate tailored content or recommendations.
That work is already here.

Real use cases with CakePHP + AI

Here are some real examples of how we’re integrating AI into CakePHP projects:
  • Document upload with automatic summaries or data extraction.
  • Customer support chatbots directly embedded in web portals.
  • Image analysis for quality control or content tagging.
  • Smart products or content recommendations.
  • Automated reporting and document generation.
Each of these features leverages the same clean CakePHP architecture (controllers, services, and models) combined with a simple AI API call.

Technical integration made simple

Here’s how easy it is to call an AI model directly from your CakePHP app: use Cake\Http\Client; $http = new \http\Client(); $response = $http->post( 'https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions', [ 'model' => 'gpt-4o-mini', 'messages' => [ ['role' => 'system', 'content' => 'You are an assistant.'], ['role' => 'user', 'content' => 'Summarize this text...'], ], ], [ 'headers' => [ 'Authorization' => 'Bearer ' . Configure::Read('OPENAI_API_KEY'), 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', ], ], ); $result = $response->getJson(); From there, you simply parse the JSON response, store or display the data, and integrate it into your workflow. The simplicity of CakePHP’s Http Client makes this process smooth and reliable.

Challenges and best practices

As with any emerging technology, integrating AI comes with responsibilities and considerations:
  • Manage API costs efficiently by batching requests or caching responses.
  • Respect user privacy and comply with GDPR, especially when handling sensitive data.
  • Implement robust error handling and retry logic for API calls.
  • Log and monitor AI interactions for transparency and quality assurance.
  • Use AI responsibly — as a tool to empower developers and users, not to replace them.

Looking ahead

The combination of CakePHP and AI opens exciting possibilities for the next generation of web applications: fast, smart, and secure. AI is not a replacement, it’s an enhancement. And with CakePHP’s solid foundation, developers can bring these intelligent capabilities to life faster than ever. This article is part of the CakeDC Advent Calendar 2025 (December 2th 2025)

The CakeDC Advent Calendar is BACK!

It’s the most wonderful time of the year! I don’t just mean the holidays… I’m talking about the CakeDC Advent Calendar!    If you missed it last year, we put together a series of blog posts in the form of a holiday advent calendar. Each day, you will get to open the gift of a new article written by one of our team members. You can wake up every morning in December with Cake(PHP). Does it get any better?    So what can you expect this year?  Great topics like: 

  • CakePHP upgrades
  • Security tips
  • CakePHP and the power of AI
  • Supabase + CakePHP
  • CakePHP Horizontal Scaling
  • CakePHP and FrankenPHP
  • Advanced Exports in CakePHP 5
  • + so much more! 

  Enjoy our gift to you that lasts the whole month through (maybe I should write poems instead of blogs?).    While you wait, here are some links from last year’s calendar to hold you over: https://www.cakedc.com/yevgeny_tomenko/2024/12/21/cakedc-search-filter-plugin   https://www.cakedc.com/ajibarra/2024/12/12/almost-20-years-a-bit-of-history-about-cakephp   https://www.cakedc.com/jorge_gonzalez/2024/12/20/5-cakephp-security-tips
  See you tomorrow! 

We Bake with CakePHP